splash
Welcome
to the Simply Leonardo DiCaprio News Center. Where all news we find is added just for you.
Posted By Taly on October 27th, 2009

Air America beta radio has mentioned last friday an unauthorized documentary about Leonardo DiCaprio’s life.You’re probably wondering, “What is this, the 90s?” In a way, yes. All of the footage featured in “Hangin’ With Leo” looks like it’s from the late 1990s, when DiCaprio was riding the wave of “Titanic” ending up on “The Beach.” If you would like [...]

 

You Are Viewing Movies

A New Writer Gets Pulled Into ‘The Twilight Zone’ (And Which Stories He Should Tackle)

Posted By Taly on November 2nd, 2010


There are few television shows as important as ‘The Twilight Zone.’ Correction, there are few shows as good as ‘The Twilight Zone,’ Rod Serling’s immortal science fiction, horror and fantasy anthology series that ran from 1959 to 1964 and helped define how great genre fiction could be on the small screen (and in general).

Now, after a movie in 1983 (‘Twilight Zone: The Movie’) and two series revivals in 1985 and 2002, Deadline reports that ‘The Twilight Zone’ is ready to head to the big screen again, courtesy of Leonardo DiCaprio’s Appian Way production company and their newly hired screenwriter, Jason Rothenberg, whose last script was an adaptation of the science fiction novel, ‘The Sparrow,’ which is still in pre-production.

It’s too early to know exactly what the folks at Appian Way and their scribe will be shooting for; whether it will be a feature-length adaptation of a classic episode, a new story in the spirit of the series or an anthology film with different directors tackling different segments, like the previous ‘Twilight Zone’ film. The best option is obviously anthology route, which won’t threaten to extend the 30-minute stories beyond their limit and will hopefully allow a lot of cool, talented filmmakers and actors to get involved.

Now, let’s play the fanboy game and decide which ‘Twilight Zone’ episodes would be the best choices for a film adaptation.

There are hundreds to choose and to think about. One of Rod Serling’s ironic, humanist stories? One of Charles Beaumont’s gothic horror tales? One of Richard Matheson’s gutsy, pulpy sci-fi adventures? The fact that all of these stories and storytellers live under one banner is the reason that ‘The Twilight Zone’ was such a great show, as well as why it would make a great movie.

Here are some good options (avoiding the stories used in the first film):

‘The Monsters Are Due on Maple Street
Although written by Serling as a metaphor for communist witch hunting and Joseph McCarthy and the House Un-American Activities Committee, this classic episode about a small town tearing itself apart when they believe they’re being invaded by aliens remains a masterpiece, a look at man’s inhumanity to man that feels just as relevant today as it did 50 years ago.

‘Time Enough at Last
The story of a man with a nagging wife and a lousy job who only wants to find time to embrace his one true love: reading books. When he finds himself a solitary survivor in a world decimated by nuclear war, he happily realizes he’s finally gotten what he wanted. Although it can easily be boiled down to its ironic conclusion, a clever script could turn this story into a wonderful, pitch dark sci-fi comedy.

‘The Invaders
A nearly dialogue-free story about a woman menaced in her home by tiny extraterrestrials, this is an intense, suspenseful story that works so beautifully as a low-budget episode of a 1960s TV series that I can’t help but wonder what a modern filmmaker with the proper sensibilities could do with it.

‘The Odyssey of Flight 33
Although it may need to be re-tooled to effectively work as part of a modern movie, the tale of the ill-fated Flight 33 and its encounter with a time vortex remains completely chilling and potentially, with modern special effects, completely epic.

‘The Obsolete Man
Another Serling script that feels completely contemporary, ‘The Obsolete Man’ takes place in a dystopia where a man is arrested and declared “obsolete” (i.e., scheduled for immediate execution) for his crimes of being a librarian and believing in God. The bulk of the episode dealt with an extended conversation between the man and a high-ranking official and any remake would be wise to do the same. This is idea-driven science fiction at its best.

‘Nothing in the Dark
Famous for featuring an early performance by Robert Redford, this episode followed an elderly woman who’s barricaded herself in her home to keep “Mr. Death” from entering and taking her to the afterlife. It’s a perfect blend of horror and sentimentality that only ‘The Twilight Zone’ could pull off.

‘Five Characters in Search of an Exit
Not a famous (or particularly good) episode by any stretch of the imagination, but the amusing set-up and bizarre conclusion make for a memorable premise. A clown, a hobo, a ballerina, a bagpiper and a soldier find themselves trapped in in large, metal room. The revelation of what they’re doing in this space acts as the climax of the episode, but it could just as easily act as the mid-point of a more thoughtful, adventurous take on the concept.

‘Number Twelve Looks Just Like You
Yet another timeless science fiction story that takes place in a society where everyone is beautiful and everyone looks completely identical … because everyone is required to undergo a medical procedure at age 19 that will give them the same body as everyone else. Naturally, our protagonist resists and the result is a dark, strange look at human identity.

But that’s just the tip of the iceberg! What episodes would you pick? Which ones would you avoid? Sound off in the comments below

‘Devil’ Of A Role For Leonardo DiCaprio

Posted By Taly on November 2nd, 2010

EXCLUSIVE: Leonardo DiCaprio is going to play one of the most prolific serial killers in Chicago history, the 19th Century equivalent of Hannibal Lecter. DiCaprio and his Appian Way partner Jennifer Killoran and Double Features partners Michael Shamberg and Stacey Sher have joined forces to acquire screen rights to The Devil in the White City: Murder, Magic And Madness At The Fair That Changed America, the 2003 non-fiction book by Erik Larson. DiCaprio will play Dr. HH Holmes, a cunning serial killer believed to have murdered anywhere from 27 to 200 people at a time when the city of Chicago was enthralled with hosting the World’s Fair of 1893. Holmes constructed The World’s Fair Hotel, an inn more lethal than the Bates Motel, especially for young single women. The sociopath used charm and guile to lure guests into what became known as a “murder castle,” a haunt that had a gas chamber, crematorium and a dissecting table where Holmes would murder his victims and strip their skeletons to sell for medical and scientific study.

In a statement, Killoran called the book “truly a one-of-its-kind American story about our nation’s first serial killer. We’re exited to bring it to the big screen.” Said Shamberg and Sher: “This is a big, entertaining thriller in an incredible setting that will appeal to worldwide audience.”

DiCaprio hasn’t played a role like this, but has long been … Read More »

‘South Park’ Uses ‘Insheeption’ To Tackle ‘Inception,’ ‘Hoarders’

Posted By Taly on November 2nd, 2010

Last week’s episode of “South Park” took its buzzsaw approach to pop culture and cut up “Jersey Shore” and “The Real Housewives of New Jersey.” On Wednesday night’s (October 20) episode, Matt Stone and Trey Parker focused their acidic approach on the problematic reality show “Hoarders” and the complicated hit summer movie “Inception.” In the episode (titled “Insheeption”), Wendy confronts Stan about being a locker hoarder (which, according to the hoarding experts, can lead to room hoarding, house hoarding or even animal hoarding). They stage an intervention, which reveals that Stan really does have a problem letting go (he insists that the expert keep a sandwich covered in maggots). Eventually, school guidance counselor Mr. Mackey and a sheep herder (“It’s pronounced ‘hoarder’”) all end up in regression therapy, which is where the “Inception” parody kicks in.

While not nearly as savage as their take on “Jersey Shore” (which clearly enrages Parker and Stone), their send-up of “Inception” is far more playful. As Mr. Mackey’s dream becomes more dangerous, more and more people try to go in after them (including Randy Marsh, a pizza delivery guy, Seattle Seahawks quarterback Matt Hasselbeck, a group of firemen — who apparently have the ability to bring ladders into dreams — and the group of dream spies lead by Leonardo DiCaprio). As the experts continue to attempt to explain themselves (“It’s like a taco inside a taco inside a Taco Bell inside a KFC inside a mall inside your dream!”), only Stan’s mom has a clear head. “Just because something is complicated doesn’t automatically make it cool,” she notes.

The episode keeps escalating until the experts call on Freddy Krueger, who reluctantly signs up to pull everybody out of the dangerous dream. The only thing it was missing? A spinning top gag.

What did you think of last night’s “Inception”-mocking episode of “South Park”? Let us know in the comments!

The Man in the Iron Mask: uncovered

Posted By Taly on November 2nd, 2010

Randall Wallace netted a stellar cast for this exercise in making free, which locks French history screaming in a dungeon

  • Article history
  • The Man in the Iron Mask Double bind … Two Leonardo DiCaprios for the price of one in The Man in the Iron Mask. All photographs: Ronald Grant ArchiveDirector: Randall Wallace
    Entertainment grade: B-
    History grade: Fail

    1. The Man In The Iron Mask
    2. Production year: 1998
    3. Country: USA
    4. Cert (UK): 12
    5. Runtime: 125 mins
    6. Directors: Randall Wallace
    7. Cast: Gabriel Byrne, Jeremy Irons, John Malkovich, Leonardo DiCaprio
    8. More on this film

    During the reign of Louis XIV, a mysterious masked man was kept prisoner for 34 years in the Bastille and other jails. His identity has never been established.

    Identity

    The Man in the Iron Mask Prison rake … not bad for a man recently encased in metal

    The film opens in a dungeon. “Are you dead yet?” grunts a jailer through a hatch, and then we see him: the man in the iron mask. The writer Voltaire claimed that the prisoner’s mask was iron, but it seems he made it up. The only piece of first-hand evidence available reports that the mask was of black velvet. Identities suggested for the prisoner have included Richard Cromwell, the Duke of Beaufort, and an Italian diplomat. While he was busy making things up, Voltaire said that it might have been the king’s secret brother. Alexandre Dumas père’s last Three Musketeers novel, The Vicomte de Bragelonne, made him Philippe, the king’s secret twin. The film plumps for this, too. In real life, the masked prisoner was registered as Eustache Dauger.

    Politics

    The Man in the Iron Mask Three stooges … the Musketeers corner their agents

    Dumas’s novel is steeped in the politics of Louis XIV’s court, incorporating the complex machinations of Jean-Baptiste Colbert and the king’s love affair with Louise de La Vallière. This film couldn’t give a toss for any of that. In place of Colbert, there’s a fleeting cameo by a massive wig, under which is concealed Hugh Laurie, playing an anonymous “King’s Advisor”. Other than that, the French state appears to have no politicians. Instead, it is a musketeerist dictatorship, run by petulant, sprout-faced Louis XIV (Leonardo DiCaprio) under the watchful eye of the loyal, fictional D’Artagnan (Gabriel Byrne). The three ageing musketeers – Athos (John Malkovich), Porthos (Gerard Depardieu) and Aramis (Jeremy Irons) – loiter around the edges, grumbling treasonously about replacing the king. If you’re thinking this cast is too good for this film: yes, it is. Moreover, DiCaprio, Malkovich and Byrne give conspicuously excellent performances, which really show the script up.

    Royalty

    The Man in the Iron Mask Bow fiddly … so that’s where the script budget went

    Aramis springs Philippe from the Bastille and carries him off to the country, where the three musketeers embark on a three-week makeover to help the traumatised boy pass himself off as his cocky twin, Louis XIV. Which means … king training montage! Watch him learn to dance all formal! Whack a sword about! Prance on a horse! Flirt with passing shepherdesses! Wear high-heeled girly shoes without giggling every time he sees his own feet!

    Plot

    The Man in the Iron Mask Brat in the hat … Leo as the wronged (and not real) Philippe

    The musketeers have to switch the princes at a swanky masked ball, under the nose of D’Artagnan. This won’t be easy, for it has already been established that D’Artagnan is the kind of badass dude who can slice an apple in half in mid-air, hurl a sword into the chest of a running man from 20 feet away, and stop an escaping helicopter by throwing a jeep at it so it blows up. One of these things doesn’t actually happen in The Man in the Iron Mask, and instead comes from the 2009 Telugu movie Magadheera. But its inclusion would hardly have made this film less accurate. In fact, it’s a pity that writer-director Randall Wallace didn’t push the camp factor even further. The screenplay is one smart rewrite and a few Jerry Bruckheimer/Michael Bay explosions away from making a wildly enjoyable, though ridiculous, movie. Unfortunately, it flashes only sporadically with the wit it would need to make it an all-out guilty pleasure. The occasional line hits the mark, such as when ninjafied priest Aramis growls “It’s judgment day,” before punching the king in the face. The historian does not recall that from The Vicomte de Bragelonne. Maybe it’s from Terminator 2.

    Verdict

    The Man in the Iron Mask Dross swords … a kitsch glitch for Malkovich

    The 1980s cartoon Dogtanian and the Three Muskehounds is considerably more faithful to literature and to history than this. And that had a wolf in a red hat playing Cardinal Richelieu.

    3D Titanic to release on 100th anniversary of sinking

    Posted By Taly on October 20th, 2010
    Titanic the Hollywood epic which established new box office records, will be released in 3D to 1coincide with the 100th anniversary of it’s namesake ship’s sinking.

    The 1997 blockbuster, which took more than USD 1.2 billion at the box office and made international stars of Leonardo DiCaprio and Kate Winslet, will be released in 2012. Its release is timed with the 100 year anniversary of the real-life disaster on April 15th 1912 which claimed over 1,500 lives, reported Daily Mail online.

    The James Cameron directed film is the second highest grossing of all time, having been eclipsed this year by Avatar. The conversion work is expected to cost up to USD 15 million and digital experts have already carried out tests on footage from the film to see what it looks like converted into the 3D format.

    Titanic producer Jon Landau said they wanted to make sure they got the process right.

    “It’s a time-consuming process, and we want to do it right. There were eight or nine companies used on the test, so we could compare. So far, there’s only a group that went to the head of the class,” he said.

    The decision to re-release a 3D version of Titanic follows the announcement last week that the six Star Wars films are to be released in the format in 2012.

    Read more at: http://movies.ndtv.com/movie_story.aspx?Section=Movies&ID=ENTEN20100155298&subcatg=MOVIESINDIA&keyword=hollywood&nid=56915&cp

    Baz Luhrmann Deciding Between Doing ‘Great Gatsby’ Or Mysterious Musical Project

    Posted By Taly on October 20th, 2010

    When fans of Baz Luhrmann heard that he was up for directing a new-millennium film version of F. Scott Fitzgerald’s classic “The Great Gatsby,” let’s just say there was an excited shout of joy, collectively. And then when it was rumored that “Romeo + Juliet” star Leonardo DiCaprio might be up for Gatsby, well let’s just say wowza! So, when MTV News caught up with Baz at “The Social Network” premiere we tried to get some updates on the project.

    “The rumors are out! I’ve got two going. One is a musical and one is a period work, both based in New York City, and I’m about to make that decision. I’ve got the script for both of them and I’m making that decision in four to six weeks, no longer than six weeks,” he teased, adding that “Gatsby” had no plans to add some singing. “Singing ‘Gatsby’? No! ‘Gatsby,’ it is the Fitzgerald book and I’ve been working on that quite a lot. The other one is also New York based and music-driven and it’s just a question of … what is the next right step for me.”

    Getting more info out of Luhrmann was a bit difficult after that. He wouldn’t say much about the musical project. And, he also wouldn’t weigh in on those Leo/Gatsby rumors. “You know I think of casting all the time, but I put that to the side and I complete the text,” he said. “Obviously there are natural choices and there is a natural top of the list, but I really refuse to say anything until we have text right.”

    Tags , , ,

    .’Inception’ Star Leonardo DiCaprio ‘Understands’ Fatherhood

    Posted By Taly on August 30th, 2010

    Leonardo DiCaprio plays a loving father in his upcoming role as Cobb in ‘Inception,’ and shares with “The Insider” correspondent Chris Jacobs his thoughts on fatherhood and childrearing.

    “I think that’s something that is instinctively innate in all of us,” he says of channeling his paternal character. “Caring for children and the love that a father would have for their own kids is something you can automatically understand.”

    DiCaprio offers a one sentence explanation of the seemingly complex film, telling Chris, “At the end of the day, it’s about one man that’s assembling a team of people in the black market of the dream world. … He’s sort of lost in the dream-scape.”

    Watch the video to get DiCaprio’s full description of his ‘Inception’ character and the “cathartic journey” that he says filmmaker Christopher Nolan (‘Dark Knight’) has created in this film. ‘Inception’ hits theaters July 16.

    Did Leo Really Make $50 Million-Plus for Inception?

    Posted By Taly on August 22nd, 2010

    Is it true that Leonardo DiCaprio earned $50 million for Inception? Aren’t stars hurting from the recession at all?
    —Blake, via the inbox

    Of course they are! Look at poor, poor Julia Roberts, who made only a reported $10 million to eat all that pizza for Eat Pray Love. Or Kristen Stewart, who supposedly earned a paltry $12.5 million for each part of Breaking Dawn. And oh, one A-lister has reportedly taken a huge pay cut:

    And that’s Tom Cruise. The actor reportedly has accepted a scaled-down salary for an upcoming fourth installment of the Mission: Impossible franchise.

    So then where does DiCaprio’s obscene haul for Inception fit into all this? It’s more like a fluke, if the facts are to be believed.

    Inception has earned about $570 million so far and, per Forbes, is expected by analysts to bank closer to $750 million before it’s all over. DiCaprio has earned more than $50 million of that—so far; the cash is still piling up over at his place—not by a simple, traditional paycheck, but with a much rarer arrangement.

    Because the film was considered a risky venture by financiers, DiCaprio agreed to take an up-front pay cut, much like Cruise will do. But unlike Cruise, who will get additional back-end pay once the film breaks even, DiCaprio cut himself a sweet deal called “first-dollar gross.”

    In plain language, that means that, once DiCaprio earned back his advance, he started raking in cash with every ticket sold, regardless of whether the film ever broke even on its $160 million budget.

    First-dollar gross used to be more common, back when men were men and superstars could demand outrageous perks from studios. Nowadays it’s harder to come by, meaning that even your megastars like Kristen Stewart can’t ask for such things.

    According to Forbes, DiCaprio’s Inception haul marks his biggest payday yet. Maybe he can foot the bill next time he and Roberts do lunch.

    Read more: http://www.eonline.com/uberblog/ask_the_answer_bitch/b196461_did_leo_really_make_50_million-plus.html#ixzz0xOBr1dXZ

    DiCaprio To Bank Dreamy Paycheck From ‘Inception’

    Posted By Taly on August 11th, 2010

    Leonardo DiCaprio stands to make at least $50 million from his latest hit Inception. And that’s only from the film’s box office earnings. With the extra revenue slated to come from DVD and television sales, he could end up earning much more.

    Exhibitor Relations predicts that Inception will earn $750 million by the time it’s completed its box office run. In less than a month the film has already earned $480 million. That’s an impressive take this summer for a movie that’s not a cartoon, a sequel or a remake. (See “Summer 2010′s Biggest Box Office Winners”)

    The film was a risky bet for Time Warner ( TWX – news – people ) studio Warner Bros. and for DiCaprio, who ranks 71st on our annual Celebrity 100. Director Christopher Nolan is the man behind The Dark Knight, which is the sixth highest grossing film of all time (not adjusting for inflation) with $1 billion at the box office. But Nolan’s non-Batman films haven’t performed quite as well. The Prestige, which featured Christian Bale and Hugh Jackman as dueling magicians, earned only $110 million in 2006.

    Inception was an original idea, with even more twists and turns with its dream within a dream within a dream plot. Audiences could have easily rejected the $160 million film.

    Because the movie was so risky, DiCaprio agreed to take a pay cut to star in it, earning well under his normal $20 million. In return he and Nolan agreed to split a pot of now-rare first dollar gross points. That means he gets money coming directly off the top of ticket sales (once he has earned back his advance). Most deals these days are structured so that stars don’t start earning until the studio has earned back its production and advertising spend.

    That risk paid off for DiCaprio, who will see his biggest payday yet. It also cements DiCaprio as a bona fide movie star who can open a film and take it to a big payday.

    DiCaprio has always earned big, but his adult-centric films haven’t always performed. Body of Lies earned just $115 million at the global box office and 2006′s Blood Diamond earned $170 million. Those aren’t flop numbers, but they aren’t the kind of returns studios want to see when they’re paying top dollar for a big star like DiCaprio.

    But 2010 has been the year DiCaprio proved he’s worth every penny. Earlier this year DiCaprio’s Shutter Island became director Martin Scorsese’s highest-grossing film of all time with $300 million in global box office earnings. Now with Inception, the actor’s movies this year alone have earned $780 million to date.

    For his next act, DiCaprio is scheduled to play the infamous FBI director J. Edgar Hoover in a Clint Eastwood-directed biopic.

    Is it time for Leonardo DiCaprio to ditch that frown and embrace his inner clown?

    Posted By Taly on August 11th, 2010

    I guess it’s true that Leonardo DiCaprio hasn’t cracked a smile on screen in about a hundred years. Or so it seems, especially if you’ve been loyally heading out to the multiplexes for all his recent films, including, of course, “Inception,” which has exactly one good joke in the entire movie, coming when one of its characters asks, “Whose subconscious are we going into exactly?”

    So I suspect my colleague, Times film critic Betsy Sharkey, has found plenty of people who agree with her provocative piece in today’s paper, which is succinctly headlined: “Lighten up, Leo!” (I’ve added the exclamation point, because, well, I knew that’s what Betsy really had in mind.) After citing all of DiCaprio’s ultra-serious movies from the past few years, Sharkey says: “Suffice it to say that there are more than enough dark endeavors to turn that deep worry line already etching its way between his brows into a veritable chasm. Besides, wouldn’t it be nice to see DiCaprio’s dazzling smile, the one that crinkles those aquamarine eyes so winningly, on something besides the Jumbotron at Lakers games?”

    But why is DiCaprio so intent on starring in such dark films? And why, as Sharkey wonders, is he so reluctant to play a sexy rake or charming conman, as he did in “Titanic” and “Catch Me If You Can”? I think the answer is pretty obvious, especially if you look at the two actors who clearly had the biggest influence on DiCaprio’s career–Robert De Niro and Johnny Depp. As it turns out, DiCaprio, who turns 36 in November, isn’t really taking a career path that’s so different from other gifted actors at his age, notably De Niro and Depp. When you’re young, especially as an actor or a musician, you’re often obsessively curious about the dark corners of the world–it feels like going for laughs is a betrayal of your gifts as an artist.

    When De Niro was 36, he still had a total aversion to mainstream Hollywood fluff, sharing his muse Martin Scorsese’s fascination with twisted and tortured characters. De Niro wouldn’t do a real comedy until “We’re No Angels,” which he made when he was 46. It was an excruciating bomb, putting him off comedy for another decade until he hit paydirt with “Analyze This.” It’s worth remembering that De Niro was at the height of his influence on young actors when DiCaprio costarred with him in “This Boy’s Life,” so it’s not at all unlikely that if De Niro gave young Leo any career advice, it was probably–Hey, kid, you’ve got talent. Whatever you do, don’t waste it on a dumb comedy like I did.

    Depp (who costarred with Leo in “What’s Eating Gilbert Grape”) is clearly the other big influence on DiCaprio, not to mention nearly every other young actor alive. And what would DiCaprio have learned from the early career choices of Depp, who didn’t turn 36 until 1999? To do just what DiCaprio has been doing–work with gifted directors. Just as Depp has spent his career making challenging films with Tim Burton, DiCaprio has now developed a creative rapport with Martin Scorsese, having made four films with him in the past eight years. Depp’s early films were nearly all director-centric, with him working with the likes of Roman Polanski, Terry Gilliam, Jim Jarmusch and Lasse Halstrom when he wasn’t doing Burton films. The only lesser light Depp allowed to direct him was Jeremy Leven, who made the awful “Don Juan Demarco,” but the obvious draw there was working with Marlon Brando.

    So I suspect that the real reason why DiCaprio is making so many dark, disturbing movies is that they are the kind of pictures that filmmakers–at least the filmmakers DiCaprio wants to work with–are drawn to. After all, the next movie on DiCaprio’s dance card is “Hoover.” Has he really had a lifelong infatuation with the long-dead FBI czar? Or does Leo just want to work with Clint Eastwood? Not all good actors have a nose for good material, but the really smart actors do have a knack for working with talented filmmakers, which is why I’m not too worried about DiCaprio. He’s making terrific movies. And when he gets old and gray and loses his hair, he and Depp can always get a few laughs doing a remake of “The Sunshine Boys.”

    Photo: Leonardo DiCaprio in a scene from the Martin Scorsese film “The Aviator.” Credit: Andrew Cooper / Miramax Films